Solving Problems with Chatbots

Employee engagement is a big issue for any company, put simply disengaged employees leads to departing talent, so it’s vital to constantly be looking for ways to develop teams, especially those working with technology, in ways that result in high levels of ongoing engagement.

During a recent conversation about engagement and issues around internal communications, a colleague of mine suggested making better use of the screens we have deployed around the office to help keep everyone in the loop and up to date. This is an admirable idea but like all comms plans depends on the content more so than the delivery mechanism; the medium may be the message, but it’s important to have a message in the first place!

The conversation about content reminded me of an article in Wired from about a year ago about Github and how they had deployed a chatbot. What was interesting for me in that article was the story of how Github employees are extending the chatbot’s capabilities by scripting new features. What makes this doubly interesting is that not only are the engineers at Github doing this but so are non-technical people. One example in the piece was about someone from the marketing department creating a script that their chatbot uses to check on the status of local street vendors.

It occurred to me that a chatbot system like this could help out with two focus areas for developing team engagement. Firstly, it could provide that content that can be so hard to source. By making a conversational interface to a content management and deployment system, the process of gathering and displaying interesting material could be dramatically improved by providing a reason to generate content as it would give everyone an excuse to interact with the cahtbot. Secondly, having a chatbot system in place could provide an outlet for non-developers who want to spend some time learning development as it could provide a purpose beyond developing the standard issue “Hello World” script, without which too many people abandon their learning efforts.

Content generation would be part of the Workflow use case for a bot

Every summer we get a bunch of interns, and in addition to their regular assigned work they are tasked with completing a technical challenge. The challenge is meant to be, well challenging, and this year we settled on Chatbots (I suspect this was entirely my fault and an abject lesson in reaping what you sow)! One team of interns was tasked with setting up a bot that can field queries about one part of the business, while the other (my team) looked at connecting a bot to AWS in order to complete Cloud tasks through a chat interface.

It is something of a tradition that while the interns get on with developing a solution in their own way, I go ahead and do the challenge myself in my own way to determine if it can be done and how differently I’d tackle the solution over how the interns go about it.

As the interns had gone down the AIML route, I decided to deploy Hubot, Github’s own chatbot.


Up next: Getting started with Hubot

Dynamics AX 2009 Oracle to SQL Server Migration

Dynamics AX no longer supports the Oracle database and so pre-AX 2012 applications still on Oracle need to be migrated to SQL Server before they can be upgraded. Here’s how to overcome the risk and fear associated with Dynamics AX Data Migration. Continue reading “Dynamics AX 2009 Oracle to SQL Server Migration”

Playing with Oracle Enterprise Manager

Quiet Friday’s are a nice treat but something too often squandered. This past Friday I found myself left to my own devices as the rest of the DBA team were working from another location. This left me free to get a few things about running our environment straight in my own mind with the most notable being was how to use CommVault for database backup and recovery beyond simply copying RMAN output to tape.

I have access to a test server for playing about with such things so I created a test database with the sample schemas to use for my backup and recovery testing. This also presented an ideal opportunity to look at the capabilities of OEM in and around monitoring databases while something bad happens to them (ahead of my recovery tests) so I first needed to install the OEM agent and the relevant options (host, databases, listener, ASM). The OEM agent went in without too much fuss (just a few things needed editing regarding SUDO and the DBSNMP database user account) and OEM got down to its monitoring duties quickly. This was a little unexpected as yesterday I had an issue with OEM getting stuck in “status pending” for one of our database instances (in that case the EMCTL command CLEARSTATE fixed it) so I was half expecting to hit a problem today. Our OEM system is configured with groups like “Database Instance” set up to send monitoring emails to the DBA team so the addition of my test system into the appropriate groups did trigger email notifications as I brought the database up and down as part of my CommVault tests.

On the CommVault front, the agent went onto the server also with surprising ease once you know to how to properly configure access permissions for the agent on Linux systems (I’ve seen this trip up administrators in the past so I knew that there were additional steps to be performed on the host beyond just deploying the agent). Once the database had the correct media policy applied it was a simple matter to run a backup. The hard part about CommVault is remembering that, with regards to Oracle, it is essentially running an RMAN backup, so dealing with database issues like dropped objects and schemas (which is what I was testing) need to be dealt with via a Point in Time recovery in order to be successful. Also, whenever CommVault throws an error, it’s best to analyse the associated RMAN log for the cause as the CommVault GUI (version 9 anyway) doesn’t reveal too much in the line of detail.

Last Friday thankfully wasn’t squandered and my initial foray into deploying OEM and CommVault now opens the door to some further adventures; I am particularly interested in deploying both of those systems to SQL Server (especially OEM!).

Oracle Data Guard and Database Incarnations

// Data Guard // Database Incarnations // Standby Logs applying in Alert Log but not in V$ARCHIVED_LOG

Over the past week I’ve been getting a great introduction to the practical workings of Data Guard. In the past I’ve worked a lot with Disaster Recovery systems built using Oracle standard edition and therefore not licensed to use Data Guard and in those circumstances a poor man’s version of the system was put in place by using RSYNC to synchronise archive logs between a production database and a DR database. With the logs in place, a script run on a schedule would recover the data from the logs. It turns out that the concept of Data Guard is pretty similar in that it’s basically about getting archive logs to the right place and setting the destination database into a mode where it can read those logs and be ready for when disaster strikes.

Using Data Guard in a production setting makes for interesting times as you get into the hows and whys of setting up the Data Guard source and destinations and then on into considerations like physical vs. logical DR databases, as well as the debate about the correct terms to use (e.g. is the DR database an “active standby” or “active data guard” system?).

Over the past couple of days I’ve been testing a procedure for switching between the production system and the DR system. The environment is made up of two geographic locations (actually situated in two different cities, which is just like something from the official documentation). On both sites there are two RAC nodes, but only on the production site are both nodes up and running – the standby is open (in read only) as a single instance, or more accurately, one node of a two-node RAC.

The procedure for the switch over is straight forward enough but during testing I did encounter something unusual with one of the scripts used to ensure archive logs are being applied to the standby. Here’s the query that caused the problem:


This query returns details of log application coming from thread #1, i.e. the first node of the source RAC – changing the thread number to 2 gets details of the logs from the other node. The end of the output of that query is:

---------- ------------------ ------------------ ---------
48192 08-JUL-13 22:33:16 09-JUL-13 00:30:17 YES
48193 09-JUL-13 00:30:17 09-JUL-13 00:56:27 NO
48193 09-JUL-13 00:30:17 09-JUL-13 00:56:27 NO
48193 09-JUL-13 00:30:17 09-JUL-13 00:56:27 NO
48193 09-JUL-13 00:30:17 09-JUL-13 00:56:27 YES

Never mind the Yes’s and No’s for now and instead focus your attention on the NEXT_TIME date, the 9th July 2013…. Today is the 24th of July! Where are today’s logs? Strangely, the alert log for the standby database is showing that everything is OK and that recovery of logs is proceeding as expected. It turns out that the problem is down to the Incarnation of the database and a misplaced ORDER BY clause.

For more on database incarnations you really should check out the official documentation, particularly the neat diagram that really explains what’s happening when you issue a RESETLOGS command, you can find all that here:

In my case, the incarnation had moved on (as a result of something we were trying out last week) and so log sequence numbers are now being reused. The query above orders its results by the SEQUENCE# and so the highest sequence number displays last, but those high log sequence numbers were generated by a previous incarnation of the database and so are not current. A simple change to the query reveals the truth of the situation:


With the ORDER BY removed, the results of the query look a lot more reassuring:

---------- ------------------ ------------------ ---------
3208 24-JUL-13 14:11:52 24-JUL-13 14:11:54 YES
3209 24-JUL-13 14:11:54 24-JUL-13 14:11:59 YES
3210 24-JUL-13 14:11:59 24-JUL-13 14:12:02 YES
3211 24-JUL-13 14:12:02 24-JUL-13 14:13:57 YES
3212 24-JUL-13 14:13:57 24-JUL-13 14:14:50 YES

Note the correct date and the low, low log sequence numbers!

Keeping track of the time, so to speak, when the database incarnation moves on is something that can catch any DBA but is one of those fun little advanced topics, along with Data Guard, that adds a little spice to the day.